In one definition, euthanasia is described as a quick death in which pain is almost absent. 1 However, there is one common understanding of euthanasia in the modern society. We will write a custom Essay on An Argument Against Euthanasia specifically for you. for only $ $11/page. certified writers online Euthanasia is a controversial subject as it is banned from all states except for Washington D.C., California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, Hawaii, Washington, and is currently still being debated in Montana according to U.S. Legal Wills. Euthanasia, also known as “mercy killing,” was first suggested on January 23, by the Ohio legislature My Point of view about Euthanasia: I am against euthanasia: because 1-Euthanisa would not only be for people who are terminally ill: It will become permissible for those as well who are not seriously ill as anyone who will not be willing to endure pain will ask for euthanasia. 2-Doctors are those who cure a life not who takes it away
An Argument Against Euthanasia - Words | Essay Example
The 29 year old terminally old patient Brittany Maynard suffered from a stage 4 malignant brain tumor that plagued her daily life with frequent seizures and stroke-like symptoms. Her inevitable death was predicted soon with certainty with absolutely no possibility for a cure. My journey is easier because of this choice. Euthanasia is a controversial subject as it is banned from all states except for Washington D. Legal Wills. It was advocated by Anna Hall in euthanasia against essay to relieve her mother from a terminal and painful illness. In the same year, Dr, euthanasia against essay. Gregory introduced a similar bill euthanasia against essay the Iowa state legislature as to bring awareness to the increasing demand, euthanasia against essay.
These two bills were only the beginning of a long process of passing a bill. Eventually inOregon became the first state to legalize aid in dying. The law was immediately challenged in the case Lee v. State of Oregon. Barbara Coombs Lee was the main advocate for the procedure as she had witnessed first hand the suffering of numerous patients in her healthcare profession. Her unforgettable year career experience influenced her pursuit to devote her professional life to individual choice and empowerment in health care. She served as a spokesperson through all campaigns defending against the judicial and legislative arenas. How it works. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act allows for terminally ill Oregonians who meet specific qualifications to end their lives by voluntary self administration of prescribed lethal doses of medication.
The requirements outline that a patient must be at least 18 years of age or older, a resident of Oregon, capable of making and communicating health care decisions, and diagnosed with a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months according to Jstor History of Euthanasia Movement Publication. change If a patient is unable to self-administer the life-ending medication, then he or she is ineligible. The decision is determined by the attending and consulting physicians. In support of the Euthanasia movement, euthanasia against essay, it is most important to recognize the characteristics of the procedure that make it more worthwhile versus detrimental.
The ability to determine the suffering of patients is none other the judgement euthanasia against essay the patient themselves. We are in no jurisdiction to say that one is not suffering enough to consider death as a viable option, euthanasia against essay. It is not our place to force the suffering into living when no possible progress can be made when death is inevitable within six months. People have the right to die, euthanasia against essay. That is even evident in the legalization of suicide. With the qualified intentions, humans euthanasia against essay independent biological beings that have the right to control his or her body and life.
She made her decision of a doctor- assisted death when diagnosed New Years Day. She had limited treatment options that would save her life, and she even considered hospice care. She was newly married to her husband in and her friends and family had always described her as an adventurous traveler until her condition worsened and tumor took over control. That decision is none euthanasia against essay her right as a suffering individual plagued with an unfortunate outcome. Euthanasia benefits the fair distribution of health resources.
The high demand of health resources results in a crisis that affects those who are ill not able to get speedy access to facilities they need for treatment. Allowing people to commit euthanasia would not only let them have what they want, but also free valuable resources to treat people who want to live. The main objection to the procedure of euthanasia conforms to the idea that it is against the will of God. Even though that God has given us free will to choose, the argument against this is that it would be wrong for to do so, euthanasia against essay. The value of suffering is also debated, as religious people view positive value in euthanasia against essay. Another argument against the use of euthanasia is that it gives too much power to doctors and may discourage them from finding cures.
Another perspective suggest that doctors should not be allowed to decide when people die. In reality, doctors do this all the time when extending medical action that increases life changes. Even though this is a different sort of decision, euthanasia against essay, since it involves shortening life, doctors make choices about treatment all the time that affects life spans of patients. Doctors that are qualified to administer euthanasia are within properly regulated reason with safeguards, so they recognize the seriousness of the decision. In the majority of cases, the decision will ultimately be made by the patient. This further strengthens the positive benefits of euthanasia suggesting that the procedure is regulated and not imposed upon patients without dire need of it.
Euthanasia has had a negative connotation for many years and has been discouraged by the majority of states. However, euthanasia against essay, the procedure has brought awareness to the critically suffering patients that are no longer able to fight for themselves. Ultimately, the law has benefited the well-being of the patients who have endured suffering without any hope, euthanasia against essay. The inevitability of death within a six month range can no longer be procrastinated euthanasia against essay the Death with Dignity act available. For any subject 4 What is it supposed to do? Need a custom essay on the same topic? Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject Get your price How it works.
Arguments Against Euthanasia: Daniel Callahan on Euthanasia
, time: 34:48Against Euthanasia - Free Essay Example - Words | blogger.com
My Point of view about Euthanasia: I am against euthanasia: because 1-Euthanisa would not only be for people who are terminally ill: It will become permissible for those as well who are not seriously ill as anyone who will not be willing to endure pain will ask for euthanasia. 2-Doctors are those who cure a life not who takes it away In one definition, euthanasia is described as a quick death in which pain is almost absent. 1 However, there is one common understanding of euthanasia in the modern society. We will write a custom Essay on An Argument Against Euthanasia specifically for you. for only $ $11/page. certified writers online Euthanasia is a debatable topic that has recently gained a lot of attention. It is also referred to as physician assisted suicide. Euthanasia was first created and used for terminally ill patients or patients who live with very painful diseases. It is an option that some terminally-ill patients have considered and in my opinion, an option that every terminally-ill patient should have available
No comments:
Post a Comment